Director Farhan Akhtar wanted King Khan's look to remain under wraps. But some enthusiasts in his team captured SRK, and leaked the picture online.
Feb 22, 2011
Shah Rukh Khan's Don 2 look leaked on Internet
Shah Rukh Khan's carefully-guarded look for the much-awaited film Don 2 has been revealed. Reports say his new look was leaked on the Internet by production people of the film. In the previous Don film, SRK had acquired a metrosexual look, and in the sequel, he will be seen in a completely ragged one. The small picture, which was leaked on the Internet, has created a furore of sorts among his fans.
Director Farhan Akhtar wanted King Khan's look to remain under wraps. But some enthusiasts in his team captured SRK, and leaked the picture online.
Director Farhan Akhtar wanted King Khan's look to remain under wraps. But some enthusiasts in his team captured SRK, and leaked the picture online.
Shah Rukh and Priyanka have already shot part of the film in Berlin, and are currently shooting in Malaysia. SRK's criminal-on-the-run role in Don 2 will present him in a totally new picture. Whether the look works or not, only time can tell.
Another buzz doing the rounds is that SRK has gone off Twitter. He was reportedly asked by Zor Ka Jhatka team to promote the show on Twitter, but he went off the site. "I get very upset by the abusive remarks made on me on my account," he said.
Source: indiatoday
Comments

Post a new comment
Comments by IntenseDebate
Shah Rukh Khan's Don 2 look leaked on Internet
2011-02-22T11:02:00-08:00
M Ahmed
Don 2 look|Internet|leaked|SRK's|
Top 10 Posts
VisionOnlineJobs Review (191 comments)
An Android Clamshell Phone: Our Worst Nightmare (107 comments)
Wateen Prepaid Account Recharge (40 comments)
iPhone 6 in 2012, New MacBook Airs in July, 15m iPhone 5s in First Batch (38 comments)
A complete small laptop - Samsung NF110 (37 comments)
Download Genuine Microsoft Office 2010 Free - No Activation Keys Required (20 comments)
Atif Aslam Criticized By Abhijit Sawant (17 comments)
Wateen Wi-Fi Settings (16 comments)
Comments by IntenseDebate